i think its ridiculous. the song does sound similar but no musics completely original.Chiffons song is a lot more upbeat and even tho Harrisons guitar riff follows the same chord progression its blatantly not ripping off Chiffons work. Chiffons songs mud anyway.
Melody : 3
Harmony : 4
Rhythm : 3
Tempo : 1
lyrics : 1
Instruments : 3 / 1 - bass,guitar,drums,vocals sure, but the instruments are different double bass is used in chiffons song and acoustic guitar is used in Harrison's.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASE STUDY 2
yeah it does look pretty similar to the chair woods has drawn
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASE STUDY 3
the site http://keirdontnet.net/projects/ohsocriminal wont open
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
::creative commons New Zealand::
Licences explained
Page navigation: Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives | Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike | Attribution Non-commercial | Attribution No Derivatives | Attribution Share Alike | Attribution | Some examples
The following describes each of the six main Creative Commons licences which will soon be offered by Creative Commons Aotearoa New Zealand. They are listed starting with the most restrictive licence type you can choose and ending with the most accommodating licence type you can choose with which to publish your work. It's also helpful to know there are a set of baseline rights all six licences offer to others.
Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd)
This licence is the most restrictive of our six main licences, allowing redistribution. This licence is often called the "free advertising" licence because it allows others to download your works and share them with others as long as they mention you and link back to you, but they can't change them in any way or use them commercially.
Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike (by-nc-sa)
This licence lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms. Others can download and redistribute your work just like the by-nc-nd licence, but they can also translate, make remixes, and produce new stories based on your work. All new work based on yours will carry the same licence, so any derivatives will also be non-commercial in nature.
Attribution Non-commercial (by-nc)
This licence lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don't have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
Attribution No Derivatives (by-nd)
This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to you.
Attribution Share Alike (by-sa)
This licence lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work even for commercial reasons, as long as they credit you and licence their new creations under the identical terms. This licence is often compared to open source software licences. All new works based on yours will carry the same licence, so any derivatives will also allow commercial use.
Attribution (by)
This licence lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation. This is the most accommodating of licences offered, in terms of what others can do with your works licensed under Attribution.
Some examples:
Attribution.
You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform your copyrighted work — and derivative works based upon it — but only if they give credit the way you request.
Example:
Jane publishes her photograph with an Attribution licence, because she wants the world to use her pictures provided they give her credit. Bob finds her photograph online and wants to display it on the front page of his website. Bob puts Jane's picture on his site, and clearly indicates Jane's authorship.
Noncommercial.
You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform your work — and derivative works based upon it — but for noncommercial purposes only
Example:
Gus publishes his photograph on his website with a Noncommercial licence. Camille prints Gus' photograph. Camille is not allowed to sell the print photograph without Gus's permission.
No Derivative Works.
You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work, not derivative works based upon it.
Example:
Sara licenses a recording of her song with a No Derivative Works licence. Joe would like to cut Sara's track and mix it with his own to produce an entirely new song. Joe cannot do this without Sara's permission (unless his song amounts to fair use).
Share Alike.
You allow others to distribute derivative works only under a licence identical to the licence that governs your work.
Example:
Gus's online photo is licensed under the Noncommercial and Share Alike terms. Camille is an amateur collage artist, and she takes Gus's photo and puts it into one of her collages. This Share Alike language requires Camille to make her collage available on a Noncommercial plus Share Alike licence. It makes her offer her work back to the world on the same terms Gus gave her.
MY COPYRIGHT LICENCE
bens blogatron by bensblogatron is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 New Zealand License.
